I'm looking for a way to try out bbbs for linux without all the
limitations of the unregistered version. Is there any "known" way of
doing that? :)
I'm looking for a way to try out bbbs for linux without all the limitations of the unregistered version. Is there any "known" way of doing that? :)
Not that I know of, and the developer is still around (nodelisted in Fidonet, and reachable via the website), so you may be better off trying out the unregistered version to see if it's worth continuing with it.
The only "limitation" that I can see in a non-registered version is
user's time online being limited to 31 minutes. And maybe the lowest number of nodes (2). Otherwise, looks like the cheapest he's offering it is $100 USD.
Probably why I never installed it. :)
Thanks for this info. I've tried the unregistered version and it seems pretty cool.
Probably why I never installed it. :)
Same here. I just don't think it's worth that much money, but it's a
nifty software.
While it did seem like a pretty decent software with a lot of features
and very Linux-esque look and feel, I have absolutely no desire to pay
for it.
I'm looking for a way to try out bbbs for linux without all the limitations of the unregistered version. Is there any "known" way of
doing that? :)
Addendum: I played with it logged in locally as the sysop (first created user) for maybe about 30 minutes, which is about all it took to realize
I didn't like the actual experience, but I'm sure if you REALLY dove
into it and changed all the defaults, learned how to do that bzscripting stuff, you could probably make it interesting. :(
Now that I've actually tried it, I have no interest in doing it again.
lol
Addendum: I played with it logged in locally as the sysop (first created user) for maybe about 30 minutes, which is about all it took to realize
I didn't like the actual experience, but I'm sure if you REALLY dove
into it and changed all the defaults, learned how to do that bzscripting stuff, you could probably make it interesting. :(
I've never liked the interface for that one. I know fix.no (I think that is/was the URL) was teh most modified one I ever saw, but it was still bbbs. LOL
I've never liked the interface for that one. I know fix.no (I think that is/was the URL) was teh most modified one I ever saw, but it was still bbbs. LOL
Yep, I think you're right. I still don't really understand how to
navigate it lol.
While it did seem like a pretty decent software with a lot of features
and very Linux-esque look and feel, I have absolutely no desire to pay
for it.
I'm looking for a way to try out bbbs for linux without all the limitations of the unregistered version. Is there any "known" way of doing that? :)
You piqued my interest so I gave it a whirl and can basically say I'm
not a fan :P Oh well hehe. Was fun to mess with.
There was a BBS called Prizm BBS that ran bbbs. It was a cool bbs. The sysop had a web server set up complete with message reading and editing, and it was smooth.
I find the documentation hard to follow. It's a lot different from
common BBS softwares. But, I'll keep at it.
Now this whole ordeal is making me wonder what MBSE looks like from a sysop's POV. Maybe I'll check it out at some point, but with any updates (much like BBBS) happening _maybe_ once per year, I already have a negative opinion on it.
I started to, and that's about the time I started disliking it. Even
found what I took as a pretty stellar bug in the GNUS command for a full screen reader thing.
Now this whole ordeal is making me wonder what MBSE looks like from a sysop's POV. Maybe I'll check it out at some point, but with any updates (much like BBBS) happening _maybe_ once per year, I already have a
negative opinion on it.
Maybe I'm just spoiled with the stuff I've already chose to use. :)
I experimented with this around the time Demonic was getting stood back
up and remember having the same 'meh' feeling about it as I just had
with BBBS. I encourage you to go inevitably get disappointed by messing around with it yourself hehe.
Oh I didn't even play around with messages. I didn't get that far lol. I did download a bunch of addons with intent to play around with them but there's really not much point and there are better BBS related
activities I can devote my time and effor to.
I ran mbse for a while a few years back. It does remind me (yes even from sysop end) of remote access in a way. I did not like the way the menus worked for adding echomail areas. That's just me though... I prefer txt config so I can make changes using an editor that supports many layers of un do. :)
Maybe I'm just spoiled with the stuff I've already chose to use. :)
This 100%. Now if you want to look at a good one I do recomend Talisman. It's modern, expandable, easy to customize etc. However already running
a modified sync setup there is really nothing any other package does that you can't do.
There. I just gave myself some extra free time to do something else. :)
Quoting Accession to Tiny <=-
I know I've tried it, I just don't remember it. That tells me about
all I need to know. :)
I have taken a look at Talisman and Enigma 1/2 already. Both look like good clean softwares, with two completely differen't ends of the
spectrum when it comes to modding and/or scripting. Both, of which I
have no idea about. :)
I hate to admit this but now there's a part of me that wants to go
install MBSE and poke around. Ugh...
I found the lua side of Talisman to be fairly easy to modify. Just as I was started to really get into that aspect of it I burned out and no longer wanted to run the BBS. Since i'm just "calling" boards now I have the part of the BBS I like, without having to deal with modern script kiddiez.
"I encourage you to go inevitably get disappointed by messing around
with it yourself hehe."
Quoting Accession to Tiny <=-
To look at another language would probably undo everything I've
already learned. lol
You encountered some script kiddies while running your BBS? Do tell..
"I encourage you to go inevitably get disappointed by messing around
with it yourself hehe."
What kind of moron came up with this drivel?
You encountered some script kiddies while running your BBS? Do tell..
Mainly they destroyed my wall of babble so I had to disconnect taht from
my website, then they just kept trying to crash the computer by connecting a hundred thousand times a second. Just nonsense like that. No real issues
just annoying.
Naaa. It's not hard to pick up languages. I learned wcbasic, pascal, some LUA etc.
Mainly they destroyed my wall of babble so I had to disconnect taht from my website, then they just kept trying to crash the computer by
connecting a hundred thousand times a second. Just nonsense like that. No real issues just annoying.
"I encourage you to go inevitably get disappointed by messing around
with it yourself hehe."
What kind of moron came up with this drivel?
This is one of the reasons I'm fearful of running any internet-facing services on my home LAN. I do all my BBS stuff on a cloud VPS. This
comes with a cost, particularly if I want to have a decent amount of storage, but the security nerd in me thinks it's worth it.
By the way, my fault for not taking your advice.
While its not the way I do it, I've found that using NFS to connect a dataset TO a could VPS it quick enough for the like of BBS downloads...
in the worse scenario I've found setting the file areas to CD-Rom at
least prompts the user as to why things might be taking a few seconds.
On Mystic you can even update the prompt to say WHY, instead of 'Copying from CD-Rom'... yer BBS is so elite tho, I can't figure out the IP. :P
By the way, my fault for not taking your advice.
Lol. So not super impressed with MBSE, eh? :P
On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 12:09:00 -0500, you wrote:
a hundred thousand times a second. Just nonsense like that. No realUh oh. Who did you piss off?
These days it's kinda hard pressed to believe it *wasn't* someone already A>involved in BBSing. I mean, people are testing out AI bots and all
that crap just to stir up arguments in the very few echos and networks
that are still active. So, anything is posible.
I need to spend some time learning wcbasic. I (like an idiot) paid
for basically everything Santronics has to offer a year or so ago and
have done nothing with it since :P
Quoting Esc to Tiny <=-
This is one of the reasons I'm fearful of running any internet-facing services on my home LAN. I do all my BBS stuff on a cloud VPS. This
comes with a cost, particularly if I want to have a decent amount of storage, but the security nerd in me thinks it's worth it.
I believe it was someone already involved. I just didn't bother getting worked up over it because I was pretty much finished with the whole
being a sysop thing anyway. :)
â– QMPro 1.53 â– Call me insane one more time and I'll eat your other eye!
This is one of the reasons I'm fearful of running any internet-facing
services on my home LAN. I do all my BBS stuff on a cloud VPS. This
comes with a cost, particularly if I want to have a decent amount of
storage, but the security nerd in me thinks it's worth it.
I didnt' run it at home for years. Possibly as long as 10 years it was
run on another network, I just didn't have a stable connection for a long time and once I did.... why change?
Quoting Accession to Tiny <=-
I mean, you have been doing this since dinosaurs roamed the earth. So,
I can sympathise with you there.
getting rough over there, was probably a good time to leave it behind
and join the userbase, anyways.
þ QMPro 1.53 þ Call me insane one more time and I'll eat your other eye!
Would that be a tearline from QModem Pro? If so, THAT brings back some memories. :)
Procomm Plus for DOS and QModem Pro for DOS were my go-to's back in
the day. Then I believe QModem Pro (maybe Procomm did as well, but I
don't think I used it) came out with a Windows version (2.x or 3.x
maybe?) and it never worked the same as the DOS version. But exiting
out of Windows to use a terminal program was more of a pain in the ass
to me than just using a janky Windows version, so I dealt with it for awhile.
Quoting Accession to Tiny <=-
Once you've set everything up, and get used to connecting to it via telnet/ssh/whatever, it becomes second nature. So much so that it
work if one drive fails. It's been running for 7+ years now without
issue, but, that's not saying something could happen at some point
leaving me up shit's creek without a a paddle. :)
There's absolutely no need to install to /opt/mbse, then also /usr/local/opt/mbse, create /home/mbse and /home/mbse/home/bbs (these are created users during the install process, so why not /home/mbse and /home/bbs - even so, is all of that really necessary?).
þ QMPro 1.53 þ Call me insane one more time and I'll eat your other
Would that be a tearline from QModem Pro? If so, THAT brings back som memories. :)
Laugh, yes. I was playing with it yesterday; I used to use QMP and was hoping to be able to use it again due to the scripting. However none of the old dos terminals seem to be able to work with modern Mystic boards.
There's absolutely no need to install to /opt/mbse, then also
/usr/local/opt/mbse, create /home/mbse and /home/mbse/home/bbs (these are
created users during the install process, so why not /home/mbse and
/home/bbs - even so, is all of that really necessary?).
I think I just threw up in my own mouth
Quoting Akacastor to Tiny <=-
Do you recall what kind of problems you've had with DOS terminals connecting to mystic boards? I am able to call into 20 For Beers
interface) and it seems to work alright - I do have to enable 'doorway mode' for the arrow keys to work, and had to disable the status bar
since 2oFB wants a 25 line screen.
DOSBox (specifically the DOSBox-X branch) and telnet BBSes, I am real curious to learn of quirks/issues I might not have run into yet.
I just got a response, it may actually be an issue with the install
script on FreeBSD.
So, if you're using Linux, just swallow that throw up and install it so you can let me know how it went. :)
I just got a response, it may actually be an issue with the install
script on FreeBSD.
So, if you're using Linux, just swallow that throw up and install it so
you can let me know how it went. :)
Ah I see :P I'll play your game, you rogue (Sean Connery accent)
Do you recall what kind of problems you've had with DOS terminals connecting to mystic boards? I am able to call into 20 For Beers
When displaying ANSI screens, all of a sudden some of the characters
were [s [h [o [w [n like that.
interface) and it seems to work alright - I do have to enable 'doorwa mode' for the arrow keys to work, and had to disable the status bar since 2oFB wants a 25 line screen.
I think that was normal with telux... it's been a long time but I
remember having to know the hotkey for doorway mode as the BBS
interfaces got more and more complex.
DOSBox (specifically the DOSBox-X branch) and telnet BBSes, I am real curious to learn of quirks/issues I might not have run into yet.
I'm using dosbox-x now. But I also have dosbox installed.
Naaa. It's not hard to pick up languages. I learned wcbasic, pascal some LUA etc.
I need to spend some time learning wcbasic. I (like an idiot) paid for basically everything Santronics has to offer a year or so ago and have done nothing with it since :P
Is WC! for Windows/DOS only, or is there linux version?
It would be cool to see a fully functional WC! BBS again.
Quoting Akacastor to Tiny <=-
Hmm, interesting, I wonder if it's an ANSI bug in Telix or an issue somewhere else. I don't think I have run into that same issue.
Though I primarily use SyncTerm right now and tend to use Telix in DOSBox-X sporadically and for testing things out.
If you happen to know anywhere that the ANSI display issue is
repeatable, that would definitely help me reproduce it. Or is it more sporadic?
Hmm, interesting, I wonder if it's an ANSI bug in Telix or an issue somewhere else. I don't think I have run into that same issue.
Could be a setting here too. Not going to rule that out.
I use magiterm for the most part. Just looking for something I could use to automate the downloading/uploading of the offline mail packets.
If you happen to know anywhere that the ANSI display issue is repeatable, that would definitely help me reproduce it. Or is it mor sporadic?
It happens on any ANSI heavy or long ansi screen for me.
I bet you could get scripting on the roadmap for magiterm. (no idea
what kind of priority Andrew would give it, but I bet he'd be happy to
get a feature request)
On Wed Jun 12 14:45:00 2024, akacastor wrote to Tiny <=-
What OS are you running? I spend most of my time in macOS but I do also run DOSBox in Windows and Linux. I'm just curious what you are running so I can maybe try to replicate the setup here.
I bet you could get scripting on the roadmap for magiterm. (no idea what kind of priority Andrew would give it, but I bet he'd be happy to get a feature request)
OK that's interesting for sure - I think Telix in DOSBox is more stable on my system. Maybe I can find if there's some differences between platforms or if it comes down to the patches I've done here to DOSBox-X. I am interested in digging deeper into this.
If you happen to know anywhere that the ANSI display issue is repeatable, that would definitely help me reproduce it. Or is it mor sporadic?
It happens on any ANSI heavy or long ansi screen for me.
Quoting Akacastor to Tiny <=-
If you are interested in the patches I am running on DOSBox-X, you can apply the patch to DOSBox-X 2024.03.01 source code, patch is found
here:
Sysop: | Kurt Weiske |
---|---|
Location: | Aptos, CA |
Users: | 132 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 124:36:29 |
Calls: | 9,712 |
Files: | 12,028 |
Messages: | 124,052 |