I really wish Biden would have announced, a year ago, that he wasn't running in 2024
Do you think that if Biden runs re-election campain then Trump simply
just wins?
Another point of mine; I don't think either candidate has the American people in their forefront... time will tell, I suppose - it sure is
gonna be fun watching the shit show.
Another point of mine; I don't think either candidate has the America people in their forefront... time will tell, I suppose - it sure is gonna be fun watching the shit show.
Seriously. I'm 41 and I feel old and out of touch. WTF do 80 years olds know about things important to the majority of people in this country? It's crazy. Imagine turning 18 and going to the polls to pick which octogenarian you think has your best interests. Ugh...
Do you think that if Biden runs re-election campain then Trump simply just wins?No, not 'just wins' - there is a lot of anti-Trump support, and I think they'll be trying hard, again, to create some issue where they make a stand for mass-mail-in voting again. I agree with mail-in voting, as its been for decades, but not mass - Americans should have to inquire about it; send everyone a postcard and thats not an election. (IMO)
We also tried to have mail-in voting during COVID as a part of campaign that could save the conservatives who were ruling for years. We shared a lot of false-patriotism related messages in the public debate to wake up some "Poland first" sentiment. We've built a wall to separate us from Belarus and Russian occupied Koenigsberg area (small part of Eastern Prussia they've kept for themselves after WWII). "We" have banned
abortion and many other things I hear are also a common
problem/challenge in the public debates in your country.
This year we had another election for the parliament and something like your Democrats have won. Which is important milestone achieved after 8 years of conservative rule. They're instantly trying to revert many
things done by our Polish "Republicans" but the country is already
almost 50/50 between these two major parties and the rest are just more extreme right and left diversions of the same thing.
Politics become more radical so instead of having both major moves more central with some a bit of left and a bit of right scent... now it's woke-progressivism vs. fascism-risking-ultimate-conservatism...
Very dangerous as not only politicians are divided.. whole society is
very polarized and the quality of various pubic and private discussions
is just plain comedy if you only can keep your distance.
Every far-right OR far-left person will fill out as many cards as they
can get their eyes on.
I believe this in both politics and at the dinner table - the world has become way too divided. When I was a youngster, people with differing opinions sat and talked about them - made points and listened to
others... it seems that is extinct. (Wow; I didn't know extinct was spelled that way - kudos Mystic??)
Every far-right OR far-left person will fill out as many cards as the can get their eyes on.
Respectfully this isn't the case. The penalties for doing so are
extremely steep and there is zero evidence of this having been done in
any substantial way, even in states (like mine) that have had mass
mail-in voting for a long time.
Yeah, people would get heated but politics never broke up families back
in the day. Sad :(
Respectfully this isn't the case. The penalties for doing so are
extremely steep and there is zero evidence of this having been done in
any substantial way, even in states (like mine) that have had mass
mail-in voting for a long time.
I don't think you (anyone) can make your first statement. I think of how many heads of households ticked one side or the other for every 18+
member of the household - and whether you believe it was substantial or not, this is one of the items we literally have video of happening
dozens of times. And not just dozens of times, but by individuals who dumped box fulls of ballots over and over again. (I can cite the videos, but they're online... one BMW pulls up 6+ times with boxes of ballots
over days... one city hall had multiple employee's dumping in the same ballot box, etc etc.)
I think we need to come together - the main thing. So I didn't like blanket mail-in voting - others want more access for voters who don't
have the resources to get out to the vote. OK; compromise, we allow mail-in ballots to anyone with legal U.S. citizenship - ID (not realID)
or some other form of verification - easy, don't have to get a passport but you do have to raise your hand and show that yer a U.S. citizen
Oh, and last point - no, CA hasn't had *mass* mail-in voting for a long time. In 2020, a ballot was sent to every registered voter. Even in CA/NY/etc states, voters had to ask for mail-in... 2020 was much
different - and IMO that gets abused more than you, or I, can prove/disprove.
*shrug* Guess I never really paid attention :P I've been a California resident for over a decade and my ballots have always been by mail. I guess I checked a box or something when I registered to get my ballot by mail or something? Who knows lol. All I know is it's easy and I dig it. And California does a great job of mailing voter info out as well to educate people about the issues and the candidates. It's all a very positive experience.
But yeah to your earlier point, I guess if mom and dad fill out their kids' ballots while they're away at school or something, that's shitty. Anywho, all I know is the voting process for me is far less
dissatisfying than things like the electoral college, primaries, the existence of the US Senate, etc., but it's not like we can just throw
the baby out with the bathwater at this point. I'll just continue being dissatisfied and do my best with what I've got. :/
Respectfully agree to disagree in that case. :) Every investigation into fraud has determined incidences to be so uncommon they're ineffectual in outcomes of elections. But I digress, and don't wanna argue with you or anything :)
Separately, voting in our country is a bit insane. The system is one by which the majority of us will never have a candidate actually represent us. I wish we'd have some sort of major reform in our political and electoral systems, there's really no other way to excite people to take part in the process unless they're motivated by anger and hatred of "the other side". It's unfortunate :(
*shrug* Guess I never really paid attention :P I've been a California resident for over a decade and my ballots have always been by mail.
You asked for it and your ID was verified - I know, I know they prolly didn't scan your ID and whatnot, but you had to 'prove' citizenship usually at the DMV or another time where you're doing govt stuff.
Do you have electronic-ID and electronic Social Security number verification/authoring and management as e-service provided to citizens
in US?
We have it in Poland for more than 10 years and this is absolutely brilliant to mange lots of public affairs in the country without even leaving home.
The right wants 'Real-ID' and the left is fighting it tooth and nail.
The right wants 'Real-ID' and the left is fighting it tooth and nail.
The right wants 'Real-ID' and the left is fighting it tooth and nail.
Definitely an overly politicized issued on both sides. Democrats view
this as an attempt to disenfranchise some voters (which are,
conveniently, mostly their voters) by the Republicans, which, hey, it probably is. But, requiring ID for certain services doesn't sound like a terrible thing on its own to most people, though similar to concerns
about disenfranchisement, requiring IDs for other government services
will disproportionately hurt the people who need those services the
most. Beyond that, a lot of people have numerous privacy concerns over
the new ID, but I don't think real-id will change much for most people, but then I also don't think it'll do a damn thing to resolve anything
when it comes to politicized fears and accusations of voter fraud.
<cut>The right wants 'Real-ID' and the left is fighting it tooth and nail.
Definitely an overly politicized issued on both sides. Democrats view
this as an attempt to disenfranchise some voters (which are,
conveniently, mostly their voters) by the Republicans, which, hey, it
The electronic-id is used to support various e-gov services targeting citizens. And it's purely optional, yet the way services are organized
are highly promotional for e-id. It's simply very easy to use it.
I recently heard about a country that is FULLY electronic - from health care to voting to everything; damn, what country was it??? Estonia???
I recently heard about a country that is FULLY electronic - from heal care to voting to everything; damn, what country was it??? Estonia???
Yeah, Estonia is very tech-savvy but it's relatively easier for them as their country population is less than Portland metro area. :)
Moving double digit million people country forward at their speed is
super challenging. Moving triple digit million country into digital
world may take decades.
We never asked that questions, we always only wanted to have the damn money for the upgrade available and the market leaders knew that so they kept improving infrastructure and today all our cities and a lot of
rural areas are on fiber offering me 600MBit for less than $20 and max
cap is 1Gbit in consumer orientated offerings.
Oh, and last point - no, CA hasn't had *mass* mail-in voting for a long time. In 2020, a ballot was sent to every registered voter. Even in CA/NY/etc states, voters had to ask for mail-in... 2020 was much
different - and IMO that gets abused more than you, or I, can prove/disprove.
I'm a NYer. They mailed me a ballot in 2020 without me asking, due to COVID-19. I still have the ballot. I'm convinced that COVID-19 was used for two purposes: to get Trump out of office, and to test their depopulation agenda out with viruses. Next time, they will attack us
with something deadlier than viruses, if they want "better" numbers.
I'm a NYer. They mailed me a ballot in 2020 without me asking, due to COVID-19. I still have the ballot. I'm convinced that COVID-19 was used for two purposes: to get Trump out of office, and to test their depopulation agenda out with viruses. Next time, they will attack us
with something deadlier than viruses, if they want "better" numbers.
The entire world let millions of people die so that democrats could get Trump out of office?
I'm a NYer. They mailed me a ballot in 2020 without me asking, due to COVID-19. I still have the ballot. I'm convinced that COVID-19 was used for two purposes: to get Trump out of office, and to test their depopulation agenda out with viruses. Next time, they will attack us with something deadlier than viruses, if they want "better" numbers.
Trump out of office?
Agreed (that I don't agree) 100%. I do think COVID was handled badly,
and that it was man-made - and WE were over there playing with virii
just the same as China was... but it got out. Terrible.
for two purposes: to get Trump out of office, and to test their depopulation agenda out with viruses. Next time, they will attack us with something deadlier than viruses, if they want "better" numbers.
The entire world let millions of people die so that democrats could get Trump out of office?
with something deadlier than viruses, if they want "better" numbers.
I don't go that far, at all, but I am concerned about 2024 - hope others respond if this is rhetoric, but if migrants whom are being processed for asylum and/or illegal immigrants are allowed to vote in 2024 the entire thing is a crock.
Kinda funny that they let Ms of ppl in during these last 4 years and somehow or another they're allowed to vote and/or get insurance/welfare
- its wrong. We allow legal entry, and a pathway to citizenship (with voting!), legally...
Agreed (that I don't agree) 100%. I do think COVID was handled badly,
and that it was man-made - and WE were over there playing with virii
just the same as China was... but it got out. Terrible.
I'm a NYer. They mailed me a ballot in 2020 without me asking, due to COVID-19. I still have the ballot. I'm convinced that COVID-19 was us for two purposes: to get Trump out of office, and to test their depopulation agenda out with viruses. Next time, they will attack us something deadlier than viruses, if they want "better" numbers.
Shit, I should have waited to read this one for the real prize.
Trump is out of office because he lost. Oh, and you know, tried to organize a coup.
Other fun facts: COVID-19 is real, and has killed millions of Americans mostly due to fuckbrains thinking it's a conspiracy. Remind you of
anyone?
You can't have it both ways. Is he out because he lost or because he
tried to overthrow the government?
It's careless, ignorant, and irresponsible to not start calculating
other ways Democrats will try to kill us next time around. Life is valuable.
I'm a NYer. They mailed me a ballot in 2020 without me asking, due to COVID-19. I still have the ballot. I'm convinced that COVID-19 was used for two purposes: to get Trump out of office, and to test their depopulation agenda out with viruses. Next time, they will attack us
with something deadlier than viruses, if they want "better" numbers.
You can't have it both ways. Is he out because he lost or because he tried to overthrow the government?
Wat. These two things aren't *even close* to being mutually exclusive.
To even imply that they are makes me question your grip on reality (not that I need more excuses for that.) He clearly lost before all of the January 6th stuff, and if he loses again this year, I'd guess more and more of those shenanigans coming to light (wonderful news story this morning about fake electors) will be partially responsible.
It's careless, ignorant, and irresponsible to not start calculating other ways Democrats will try to kill us next time around. Life is valuable.
Dumb.
I'm genuinely curious about why you think Democrats want to depopulate
the country. Never mind the fact that this is clearly at odds with your theory that Biden has been softer on illegal immigration so he'd have
more voters in 2024, but generally speaking, for people who wish to
wield this kind of power (in either party) in our wonderful faux democracy, they need *living people* to do so. Not only to have voters/supporters, but you know, you gotta actually have something to
rule over, right? Who wants to rule over a wasteland?
That's where American politics is extremely interesting right now from
the foreign perspective as continuation of isolationism as a direction
may not only change America but the world.
Agreed (that I don't agree) 100%. I do think COVID was handled badly, and that it was man-made - and WE were over there playing with virii just the same as China was... but it got out. Terrible.
I'm glad that you agree at least that much. One of Trump's flaws is that he won't admit that covid-19 is the USA's fault. Based on what we've
been told by the media, the research involving mutating SARS to make it more deadly than it already is, was funded by the USA. We paid for it,
our researchers participated, and our messed up country is to blame for it, at least partly.
I'm genuinely curious about why you think Democrats want to depopulate
the country. Never mind the fact that this is clearly at odds with your theory that Biden has been softer on illegal immigration so he'd have
more voters in 2024, but generally speaking, for people who wish to
wield this kind of power (in either party) in our wonderful faux democracy, they need *living people* to do so. Not only to have voters/supporters, but you know, you gotta actually have something to
rule over, right? Who wants to rule over a wasteland?
cleaner air and cleaner water." The fourth clue is Kamala Harris also said that "the migrants won't be staying for long."
our researchers participated, and our messed up country is to blame f it, at least partly.
You know what - I agree with this, too. We allow these foreign labs to
do our bidding... why the hell are we messing around with; well, I guess we HAVE to - else other nation states will surpass us... but we get
sloppy more than the population understands.
cleaner air and cleaner water." The fourth clue is Kamala Harris also s that "the migrants won't be staying for long."
Did she really say that? I missed that. That really changes my opinion of her.
I wish someone could explain the benefit of intentionally mutating SARS. I've heard some crap about "So that they could develop vaccines," but
that doesn't really explain anything.
You can't have it both ways. Is he out because he lost or because he tried to overthrow the government?
I take covid-19 seriously. I wear an n95 mask everywhere I go, even outdoors, and despite what the media says about it, they actually work. I've never been more virus-free in my life. It's a real virus, and it's a real conspiracy. Covid-19 is a mutated SARS virus, and the NIAID admitted to intentionally mutating SARS viruses. Remind you of anything?
It's careless, ignorant, and irresponsible to not start calculating other ways Democrats will try to kill us next time around. Life is valuable.
It was esc who said that Trump lost because he attempted a coup, but my reply was that "no, he didn't lose because of the coup."
The long answer is that Democrats (and some Republicans too) are members of the World Economic Forum. That's the 2nd clue (covid is the 1st
clue.) The third clue is Kamala Harris saying that "population control will lead to cleaner air and cleaner water." The fourth clue is Kamala Harris also said that "the migrants won't be staying for long."
Guess we'll see at it goes...
Far right, or I shouldn't use that moniker about any group... but they feel like the left in power is so far away from what they believe in
that they 'MUST' want to get rid of the pop...
As stated, I lean a bit one way or the other - but I think coming
together is the most important thing in our countries future. If we continue to not be able to talk... well, we're just gonna keep getting further apart.
I wish someone could explain the benefit of intentionally mutating SARS. I've heard some crap about "So that they could develop vaccines," but
that doesn't really explain anything.
The long answer is that Democrats (and some Republicans too) are members of the World Economic Forum. That's the 2nd clue (covid is the 1st clue.) The third clue is Kamala Harris saying that "population control will lead to cleaner air and cleaner water." The fourth clue is Kamala Harris also said that "the migrants won't be staying for long."
Personally, while I have a huge imagination, my first step in evaluating these kinds of conspiracy theories is always to question what the
actors' motives would be in a logical, deductive way. While it's true
that people can behave in self-destrutive or highly irrational ways,
that is usually much smaller scale, more impulsive stuff, not huge, decades long international conspiracies. My question about why Democrats would want to kill off the population is a great example of this. You
may disagree their social and/or economic policies, but Democrats aren't Bond villains, FFS. :P
Kamala Harris is right in that first point, but that doesn't necessarily mean she wants to kill people off, or even force people to have less children China style... and her comment about migrants not staying?
Again, seems TOTALLY at odds with your conspiracy theory about illegal immigrants helping Democrats win the election. Why would they want to
let them in only to kill them off with a virus? Your logic is... bewildering.
It's true, but when people get so far on one side or the other that they start forming what seems to relatively normal people irrational or even *insane* conspiracy theories, it can be kind of hard to any sort of productive conversation because logic fails, evidence is denied or excused, etc.
Personally, while I have a huge imagination, my first step in evaluating these kinds of conspiracy theories is always to question what the
actors' motives would be in a logical, deductive way. While it's true
that people can behave in self-destrutive or highly irrational ways,
that is usually much smaller scale, more impulsive stuff, not huge, decades long international conspiracies. My question about why Democrats would want to kill off the population is a great example of this. You
may disagree their social and/or economic policies, but Democrats aren't Bond villains, FFS. :P
This is the lens through which I view any "the government is doing x es> horrible thing" - no, it's not, there is NO way people would follow these es> orders, and NO way any of this could be kept secret.
IMO Harris has been - a nothing. A complete zero vice pres... I
certainly hope Biden backs away from 2024, and don't have to think twice about Kamala - she won't be the one. :P
I've been watching this admin - and sure, I love a gal vice pres... but cmon, dude - Kamala being right about anything over the past 3.5 years
is laughable. :P I mean - you don't have a straight face while saying that, right?? Theres a smirk - I know it.
IMO Harris has been - a nothing. A complete zero vice pres... I
certainly hope Biden backs away from 2024, and don't have to think twice about Kamala - she won't be the one. :P
voting. How should it go in 2024; the part that I hate is that the right wants realID - ONLY... and the left wants [another, bs... cough.] mass mail-in - send everyone that is even close to being a 'voter' a 5x3 in
the mail, for anyone at that address to fill out....
And I'm saying I think we should have an ID to vote - but lets
negotiate. Not go round about ways to push whatever we can, by the skin
of our teeth 'legally' - Amerikkkka needs to get back to talking -
giving - taking - talking.
You need an ID to buy a freaking money order. Can we at least have that for voting for the president of the free world??? Please?
Whether or not she's been a terrible vice president has nothing to do
with her ability to be correct. That's a really close minded way of thinking. You think because you don't like Kamala Harris that she's literally of incapable of making any valid statement or having even a single opinion that aligns with yours? Really? I can't fucking stand Trump, and while it makes me shudder to say this, I'm sure he's said and done plenty that I agree with and/or acknowledge as right. Even a broke clock is right twice a day, etc.
Ha! I don't care about this issue as much as you might imagine I do. Do jp> you think because I'm left leaning that my opinions automatically jp> perfectly align with what Fox News says it is or something? Come on. jp> You've said yourself that you don't align 1:1 with any party of typical jp> political ideology, so give me the same courtesy of assuming mine don't jp> either. :P
One of the reasons I don't care that much is that, from my personal perspective, we're already doing it. I've always been required to show identification when voting.
That's the biggest 'complaint' I have about 2020 - is that while you and
I show an ID when we go vote at the library, church or schoolhouse, the mass-mailin voting that was slam dunked on America opened up the possibilities for MASSES to vote w/o doing so. Furthermore, and I know this wasn't your argument, is it 'allowed', 'engaged' or 'persuaded' non-voters to doso; I'm in the belief that voting should be like it has been for the history of our country;
you register
you prove citizenship (not a big deal, but you show yer ID when you vote) [or] you raise your hand and request mail-in voting
... you vote.
All that being said, I'd like more Americans voting - and have open ears about how to do that in a civil, fair and American way... [conspiracy
bit] giving the getaways the opportunity to vote in 2024 is NOT that.
Ultimately, the problem isn't whether or not people have the opportunity to vote, it's getting them to get off of their asses and do it. Mail-in voting makes the process for more convenient, but sure, it should come with appropriate ways to authenticate ballots (and including improving what we're already doing in states like mine, which isn't NOTHING, but it's far from perfect.) Honestly, the idea of some kind of national way
to authenticate voting (more involved than Real-ID) like Hollowone mentioned in Poland (or you mentioned with Estonia) is probably more
like what we need, but I don't see that happening any time soon.
With technology where it is, code could be written to literally verify an identification using the tech in all of our pockets - but as h1 also
said, the infrastructure would take XX years to put in place... I guess.
(And still think Biden is the correct and true winner of that election.)
Sysop: | Kurt Weiske |
---|---|
Location: | Aptos, CA |
Users: | 132 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 124:35:46 |
Calls: | 9,712 |
Files: | 12,028 |
Messages: | 124,052 |